Repealing Health Law Would Mean More Benefits for Members of Congress

Watch our new video featuring Republican Members of Congress denying that they voted to protect taxpayer funded health care benefits for themselves, while repealing critical patient protections for the middle class and doing nothing to create jobs.

Before last week's repeal vote, The Hill newspaper found that repealing the Affordable Care Act would "let members of Congress keep their government-subsidized insurance coverage after they retire -- a benefit they lost under the health law."
http://thehill.com/blogs/healthwatch/politics-elections/236823-repealing-health-law-would-mean-more-benefits-for-members-of-congress

The Hill found that "a Republican amendment to the Affordable Care Act -- kicked members of Congress and their aides out of the healthcare program for federal employees. Instead, lawmakers and staff have to get coverage through the insurance exchanges created by the healthcare law. Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), who championed that provision, said it ensures that lawmakers live under the same rules as their constituents."

View the original article here

Repealing Health Law Would Mean More Benefits for Members of Congress

Watch our new video featuring Republican Members of Congress denying that they voted to protect taxpayer funded health care benefits for themselves, while repealing critical patient protections for the middle class and doing nothing to create jobs.

Before last week's repeal vote, The Hill newspaper found that repealing the Affordable Care Act would "let members of Congress keep their government-subsidized insurance coverage after they retire -- a benefit they lost under the health law."
http://thehill.com/blogs/healthwatch/politics-elections/236823-repealing-health-law-would-mean-more-benefits-for-members-of-congress

The Hill found that "a Republican amendment to the Affordable Care Act -- kicked members of Congress and their aides out of the healthcare program for federal employees. Instead, lawmakers and staff have to get coverage through the insurance exchanges created by the healthcare law. Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), who championed that provision, said it ensures that lawmakers live under the same rules as their constituents."

View the original article here

A warning to Congress? Supreme Court's health care ruling may have negative side effects

Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), a ranking member of the Subcommittee on the Constitution, sits down with "Viewpoint" host Eliot Spitzer to discuss the ramifications of the Supreme Court's decision to uphold the Affordable Care Act.
Tune in Weeknights at 8e/5p on Current TV
http://current.com/shows/viewpoint/

View the original article here

Alere Health CEO Mike Cotton Gives Opening Remarks at 9th Annual World Health Care Congress

Mon, Apr 16, 2012, 3:33 PM EDT - U.S. Markets close in 27 mins.

Sorry, I could not read the content fromt this page.

View the original article here