Showing posts with label Support. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Support. Show all posts

Friday, June 29, 2012

Health Care Law Lacks Support - But So Does the Status Quo

Americans are equally dissatisfied with the current health care system and with the federal law intended to improve it - suggesting that the U.S. Supreme Court's decision on that law will by no means end the country's sharp political debate over health care policy.

Just 36 percent in this ABC News/Washington Post poll express a favorable opinion of the health care law under Supreme Court review. But ratings of the health care system as it currently stands are about as weak, 39 percent favorable. That means that while the intended fix is unpopular, so is the status quo - leaving the public still in search of solutions.

See PDF with full results, charts and tables here.

One key challenge is that while Americans are broadly dissatisfied with the system overall, vastly more - 75 percent - rate their own quality of care favorably. The difficulty thus remains where it's been all along: Forging solutions to the current system's problems that don't leave people fearing they'll lose what many see as their own good quality of care now.

[Related: Romney pushed for individual mandate in Mass.]

The high court's ruling on the health care law, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, known as the ACA, is expected Thursday. While the law's popularity is weak, barely more than half, 52 percent, see it unfavorably, including 38 percent who have a "strongly" unfavorable opinion. With key provisions yet to take effect, 12 percent are undecided.

Other polling has indicated that a variety of aspects of the ACA are broadly popular - but that these are outweighed by the unpopularity of the so-called individual mandate, requiring nearly all adults to purchase insurance or pay a fine.

Another difficulty for proponents of the ACA is that dissatisfaction with the health care system now, or with current care, doesn't boost support for the new law. Among people who rate the current system unfavorably, just 35 percent have a favorable opinion of the ACA. And among those who give a negative review to their own care, the ACA's popular with just 32 percent.

[Related: Biggest insurer to keep parts of 'Obamacare,' regardless of ruling]

Still, while the ACA is not popular, an ABC/Post poll in May found weak support for Mitt Romney's call to repeal it - a 40-40 percent division in favorable vs. unfavorable views. And in another measure, in April, just 38 percent said the Supreme Court should reject the law in its entirety. Twenty-five percent wanted it entirely upheld; 29 percent said it should be upheld in part, rejected in part.

POLITICAL LINES - This poll, produced for ABC by Langer Research Associates, finds sharp political differences, with the ACA seen favorably by 59 percent of Democrats, falling sharply to 36 percent of independents and just 14 percent of Republicans. Ideological divisions are similar, with liberals nearly three times more supportive of the law than are conservatives.

[Related: Woman who helped change AIDS stereotype still fighting]

Divisions on the current health care system are more muted. Republicans divide, 47-49 percent, in favorable vs. unfavorable opinions of the system as it is now. Positive views are 10 and 13 percentage points lower among Democrats and independents, respectively.

Among one group - conservative Republicans - favorable views of the current system inch over the halfway point, to 51 percent, while positive ratings of the ACA crater in this group at just 11 percent. Across the spectrum, among liberal Democrats, the current system is less popular by 19 points, while the ACA is more popular by a vast 60-point margin vs. conservative Republicans.

Get more pure politics at ABC News.com/Politics and a lighter take on the news at OTUSNews.com

A difference in intensity of sentiment boosts critics of the health care law: It's seen "strongly" unfavorably by 63 percent of Republicans and 57 percent of conservatives, but strongly favorably by just 30 percent of Democrats and 31 percent of liberals.

OTHERS - Among other groups, views of the ACA are more strongly negative by 15 points among full-time workers vs. those who are employed part time; by 18 points among middle-aged and older adults (40 and up) vs. those who are younger; and by 10 points among people with middle or higher incomes vs. those with household incomes less than $50,000 a year.

Positive ratings of current care, for their part, peak among senior citizens, at 86 percent - perhaps ironically, given their enrollment in the government-run Medicare program. Current care ratings also are higher, by 15 points, among people with $50,000-plus incomes, vs. their lower-income counterparts. And strongly favorable ratings of current care spike, in particular, among people in $100,000-plus households.

[Related: Is the individual mandate a red herring?]

In all, however the Supreme Court rules, views on health care leave most Americans in a long-familiar place: torn between satisfaction with their own quality of care and unhappiness with the current system overall - and dissatisfied with the solutions as yet put forth.

METHODOLOGY - This ABC News/Washington Post poll was conducted by landline and cell phone June 20-24, 2012, among a random national sample of 1,022 adults. Results have a margin of sampling error of 3.5 points. The survey was produced for ABC News by Langer Research Associates of New York, N.Y., with sampling, data collection and tabulation by SSRS/Social Science Research Solutions of Media, Pa.

Also Read

View the original article here

Wednesday, June 20, 2012

Poll: Vast support for new health care effort

WASHINGTON (AP) — Americans overwhelmingly want the president and Congress to get to work on a new bill to change the health care system if the Supreme Court strikes down President Barack Obama's 2010 overhaul as unconstitutional, a new poll finds.

A new health care bill doesn't seem to be in either party's plans on the verge of the high court's verdict on the law aimed at extending health insurance to more than 30 million Americans who now lack coverage. Republicans say they will try to repeal whatever's left of the law after the high court rules and then wait at least until after the November elections to push replacement measures. Democrats say Obama will push to put in place whatever survives.

But an Associated Press-GfK poll shows that more than three-fourths of Americans do not want their political leaders to leave the health care system alone in the event the court throws out the health care law.

Large majorities of both opponents and backers of the law share the view that Congress and the president should undertake a new effort. The lowest level of support for new health care legislation comes from people who identify themselves as strong supporters of the tea party. Even in that group, though, nearly 60 percent favor work on a new bill.

Gary Hess, a Republican from Discovery Bay, Calif., wants the high court to throw out the entire law.

But Hess, 77, said he favors the provision requiring insurance companies to cover people regardless of their medical condition. "There needs to be compromise on both sides," the retired school administrator said.

Garrett Chase, 51, said he hopes the court leaves the law in place but agreed with Hess that the politicians should get back to work if this law is struck down. "I live in the ghetto, and I see people dying every day," said Chase, an unemployed car salesman from Baltimore. "They can't get help because they can't afford it."

The call for new legislation comes even as just a third of Americans support the landmark health care law. The overall level of support for the law is relatively unchanged in recent months, with 47 percent opposing it. But among independents, only 21 percent approve of the law, a new low in AP-GfK polling.

Most of the law's major changes have yet to take effect, including the requirement that most people have health insurance or pay a penalty. The insurance mandate has been among the least popular aspects of the law. Provisions that have gone into effect include extended coverage for young adults on their parents' insurance and relief for seniors with high prescription drug costs.

A narrow majority say the outcome of this year's presidential contest between Obama and his presumed challenger, Republican Mitt Romney, will have a big effect on the nation's health care system. Republicans, at 58 percent, are most likely to see a link between the election and health care. Forty-eight percent of Democrats and 42 percent of independents believe the election will have a great deal of impact on the health care system.

Obama's approval rating on handling health care was unchanged compared with polls in May and February. Forty-eight percent approve and 50 percent disapprove of his handling of the issue. Independents' disapproval of Obama on health care topped 50 percent for the first time since October.

The Associated Press-GfK Poll was conducted June 14-18 by GfK Roper Public Affairs and Corporate Communications. It involved landline and cellphone interviews with 1,007 adults nationwide and has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 4 percentage points.

___

Associated Press writer Stacy A. Anderson, Deputy Director of Polling Jennifer Agiesta and News Survey Specialist Dennis Junius contributed to this report.

___

Online:

http://www.ap-gfkpoll.com


View the original article here

Thursday, May 31, 2012

TELUS Health to Support Newfoundland and Labrador in Expansion of the Newfoundland and Labrador Electronic Health ...

MONTREAL , May 30, 2012 /CNW/ - TELUS Health today announced it has signed an agreement with the Newfoundland & Labrador Centre for Health Information (the Centre) to support the next phase in the province's deployment of an interoperable Electronic Health Record (iEHR).

The Centre's interoperable Electronic Health Record/Labs (iEHR/Labs) program is the next phase in Newfoundland & Labrador's implementation of an iEHR and will make important health information available to clinicians across the province. This new agreement continues the working relationship developed between the Centre and TELUS Health, which drew extensively on TELUS' technology capability to begin deploying the Pharmacy Network. The Pharmacy Network project delivered a core component of an EHR with the Health Information Access Layer (HIAL), in addition to a drug repository that connects the community pharmacies. The iEHR/Labs program will leverage this technology to support the additional iEHR information domains and components that will be implemented through this next phase.

"We are extremely pleased to continue our successful relationship with the Centre and work with the province of Newfoundland & Labrador on such an important initiative," says Glenn De Roy, vice president of Health Delivery Solutions for TELUS Health Solutions. "Deploying iEHR will give authorized health professionals secure, real-time access to critical health information, ensuring that Newfoundlanders receive better, more efficient care delivery."

In 2009, the Centre began deploying the Pharmacy Network, which connects pharmacies with a central, province-wide Drug Information System. Since then, more than 75 pharmacies have joined, covering more than 185,000 patients (about 34% of the province's population). The network currently contains 2.9 million medication dispense records, a figure which is increasing daily. More importantly, there have been more than 27,000 instances of shared information, meaning a pharmacist had access to additional information in delivering care to their client.

Designed and created by TELUS Health to meet Canada Health Infoway EHR Blueprint specifications, the HIAL, as a core component of the NL EHR, manages interactions between clinical systems (pharmacy management systems, hospital information system, physician EMRs, etc.), provincial repositories (drug, lab, shared health records, etc.) and provincial registries (client, provider, location and user). In addition to providing the first version of the HIAL contained within the Pharmacy Network, TELUS Health also provided the provincial Drug Information System, a medication management portal and a data warehouse. Since 2009, TELUS Health has also worked in partnership with the Centre in supporting the Pharmacy Network's production environment, through its managed services offering.

As part of the iEHR/Labs program, TELUS Health will extend HIAL services to include support for additional HL7 messages to support Lab and Shared Health Record interactions. A service will be added to manage the clinical terminologies associated with the expanded set of health information.  TELUS Health will also leverage its strategic relationship with HIPAAT to integrate HIPAAT's leading Privacy eSuite consent management service into the HIAL, which will add patient-centered privacy protection to all healthcare information. Committed to industry standards, TELUS Health will continue to align the solution to Canada Health Infoway's vision and standards.

TELUS Health will work with the Centre and other members of the project team to begin deployment of the new technology in 2013.

About TELUS Health
TELUS Health is a leader in telehealth, electronic health records, remote patient monitoring, mobile home and community care, consumer health, benefits management and pharmacy management. Our solutions give health authorities, providers, physicians, patients and consumers the power to turn information into better health outcomes. For more information about TELUS Health, please visit www.telushealth.com.


View the original article here

Wednesday, May 16, 2012

Self-management support should be routine part of primary health care delivery

Health Council of Canada releases report on self-management support for Canadians with chronic conditions

TORONTO, May 15, 2012 /CNW/ - Today the Health Council of Canada released Self-management support for Canadians with chronic health conditions: A focus for primary health care. The report explores how self-management support can improve patient outcomes and calls for health systems across Canada to provide self-management supports in a more systematic way. It profiles a range of practices and recommends targeted investments in self-management support strategies.

Chronic disease in Canada costs more than $90 billion a year in lost productivity and health care costs. And with half of Canadians reporting at least one chronic condition, these costs will continue to rise. Successful self-management can help save health resources and keep patients out of hospital for preventable incidences.

Self-management refers to the things a patient does to live well with chronic conditions, like monitoring symptoms, taking medication as prescribed, and recognizing what health-related behaviours will help manage their conditions. New research shows that patients who successfully self-manage tend to have reduced disease-related effects and may make better use of health services because they monitor symptoms effectively and can prevent or respond to problems before they become a crisis.

Self-management support includes education and health coaching and is key to ensuring patients manage their health successfully. In Canada, 95% of adults with multiple chronic conditions have a regular primary care provider - making this a clear area in which to anchor self-management support. Primary health care providers should be an ongoing source of self-management support to follow up with patients and link them to community services and specialists. The problem is that this support role is not yet a routine part of care in Canada.

The report discusses how primary health care providers can better assume this support role for patients with chronic conditions. Self-management support can start at routine primary care visits where providers can empower patients to confidently ask questions and get involved in making decisions about their health. The provider can assist with self-management education and technical skills, and can support personal goal-setting with the patient. Another important role for providers is to link patients to community-based programs. There are many promising programs that exist to support self-management, but patients may need their provider to point them in the right direction and follow up with them on their progress. Providers can also improve aspects of their practice environment in order to better serve patients with chronic conditions.  Making better use of all members of a health care team can ease time pressures on physicians and provide patients with the expertise and coaching they need. Health care professionals like nurses, social workers and pharmacists can play a role (especially when many family doctors only have 15 minutes, on average, to devote to patient visits). Offering group visits and integrating self-management support programs directly into primary care settings can also yield positive outcomes.

Given their access to Canadians with chronic-disease, primary health care providers need to be enabled to deliver self-management support. We must invest in ongoing education for providers in self-management support, and encourage the expansion of primary health care teams which can use a variety of health care providers to deliver self-management support. Supporting and creating better links between primary care providers and community-based self management programs will help increase participation and engagement by patients in their own care.

"Self-management has great potential for patients, providers and Canadians," said John G. Abbott, CEO, Health Council of Canada. "Patients and their families will enjoy better quality of life. Primary care providers will have the tools to help their patients succeed."

Investing in ongoing, long-term support for self-management support needs to be a key priority for governments. Collaboration among governments, health care providers and chronic disease organizations can help fill gaps in service and create an integrated, system-wide approach to self-management support. Further recommendations to enable self-management support in a more systematic way can be found in the report.

About the Health Council of Canada

Created by the 2003 First Ministers' Accord on Health Care Renewal, the Health Council of Canada is an independent national agency that reports on the progress of health care renewal. The Council provides a system-wide perspective on health care reform in Canada, and disseminates information on leading practices and innovation across the country. The Councillors are appointed by the participating provincial and territorial governments and the Government of Canada.

Image with caption: "Self-management support for Canadians with chronic health conditions: A focus for primary health care (CNW Group/Health Council of Canada)". Image available at: http://photos.newswire.ca/images/download/20120515_C7467_PHOTO_EN_13697.jpg

Audio with caption: "Podcast with Kelly McQuillen, Director, Acting Executive Director, B.C. Ministry of Health, and Connie Davis, a nurse practitioner and consultant on health care design". Audio available at: http://stream1.newswire.ca/media/2012/05/15/20120515_C7467_AUDIO_EN_13701.mp3


View the original article here

Thursday, May 3, 2012

Rally in support of Texas Women's Health Program at Planned Parenthood in McAllen

A rally was held early Monday evening in support of the Texas Women's Health Program offered at Planned Parenthood clinics.

Julisa McCoy was a 23-year-old UTPA student who participated in the rally outside the McAllen clinic off Hackberry Street.

She's also 1 of about 6,500 women in Hidalgo County who relies on health services and contraception provided at Planned Parenthood.

"It's allowed me to seek the preventive and reproductive care that I need as a woman... as a young woman, without having to take on an additional load or responsibility which is a second job," she said.

Texas law bans Planned Parenthood from participating in the Texas Women's Health Program, federal-state Medicaid program for the poor, because the organization provides abortions.

A federal judge temporarily blocked the new Texas rule on Monday, citing it as unconstitutional.

Planned Parenthood's Hidalgo County CEO, Patricio Gonzales, says none of the clinics in the Rio Grande Valley offer abortions and calls the move to exclude the organization from funding, a political ploy.

"It does not subsidize in anyway...for that service... We can't even council on abortion with this program," he said.

"The injunction likely buys Planned Parenthood and the women they serve about 3 to 4 months before a judge rules again in the case.

The Texas Governor's Office has indicated the State will aggressively fight to keep that ban in place.

Catherine Frazier, Governor Rick Perry's Press Secretary sent this statement to Action 4 News: "Texas has a long history of protecting life, and we are confident in Attorney General Abbott's appeal to defend the will of Texans and our state law, which prohibits taxpayer funds from supporting abortion providers and affiliates in the Women's Health Program. We will continue to work with the Attorney General to pursue all available legal options."

There are fears an outright ban will burden an already fragile healthcare system and leave many of the 130,000 women enrolled in the program statewide with no basic health care and contraception.

"They would be displaced, they would not have a provider to go to," Patricio said.

Julisa has been using Planned Parenthood for the last four years.

"I don't know what I would do," she said in response to a possible ban. "I'd have to wait until the end of the month to see I have enough money... Or save enough money... Or just go without it... And it seems that more than likely it would be the latter."

The Texas Women's Health Program began in 2007 with the ban in place.

Texas only notified the federal government last year of its intent to begin enforcing the ban.

Click here to join Ryan Wolf's Facebook page
Click here to follow Ryan Wolf on Twitter


View the original article here

Sunday, April 1, 2012

Is the health care mandate on life support?

Editor’s note: The Supreme Court’s three days of hearings on health care end today. The audiotapes of those hearings, and the written transcripts, will be available later in the day on the Court’s own website, www.supremecourt.gov.

Photo via Wikimedia Commons. Courtesy of DonkeyHotey.

The centerpiece of the new federal health care law, and its most controversial part – the individual insurance mandate – looked to be doomed after the first hour of the Supreme Court’s hearing on it Tuesday. But it seemed to rally in the second hour, and, while not exactly assured of being upheld, had conspicuous signs of new life.

When the Court’s most conservative Justices started the hearing with a barrage of very hard questions for the government’s lawyer, Solicitor General Donald B. Verrilli, Jr., those in the courtroom started focusing on Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, to see whether he would join in.

And, in fact, Kennedy seemed as skeptical as Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., and Justices Antonin Scalia and Samuel A. Alito, Jr. If, as everyone assumes, Justice Clarence Thomas, a sturdy foe of broad congressional authority, voted against the mandate, he and those four could make a majority for a 5-4 result.

Kennedy seemed to have picked up on one of the key arguments by the mandate’s challengers: the provision was not a form of regulating existing economic activity, but was in fact a form of coercion for individuals without health insurance to enter for the first time into economic activity over their objection.

Starting with the assumption that the mandate was “a step beyond what our cases have allowed,” Kennedy told Verrilli that it would change “the relation of the individual to the government in this…unique way.” Thus, he said, Verrilli had a “heavy burden” to justify it.

Later on, Kennedy repeated his concern about changing that core citizenship relationship in a “very fundamental way.” It was not apparent that the Solicitor General, in his responses, had given the “justification” that Kennedy was seeking.

But the atmospherics of the argument changed markedly when two Washington lawyers representing the challenging states and private parties, Paul D. Clement and Michael A. Carvin, took their turns. The Court’s more liberal members – and especially Justice Stephen G. Breyer – took up a fervent defense of the mandate as necessary to deal with the national problem of having nearly 40 million Americans without an assured way to pay for their health care, which Breyer said was burdening the entire health insurance market.

Breyer was joined, but with a little less passion, in that defense by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor, thus indicating that the mandate did have champions on the Court – but only four in number. Only if they could draw Justice Kennedy to their side, it appeared, might they prevail.

The changed tone of the hearing may have had some impact on Kennedy. The next time he expressed his “concern” it was not about the threat to the citizen-government relationship. In a notably softer voice, the Justice said that “most questions of life are matters of degree.” That was an indication, it seemed, that he was developing some flexibility in analyzing the issues surrounding the mandate.

Young and healthy Americans, Kennedy then observed, could, if they have no health insurance, be in a position that was “very close to affecting the rates of insurance and the costs of providing medical care in a way that is not true in other industries.” The claim that Congress could do what it did with the mandate because the health insurance industry was unique was a basic argument that Solicitor General Verrilli had made. If Kennedy was now seeing that health care financing is different, his vote might well be available for the mandate.

Although there is no hard evidence to support the notion, it is widely believed that, because of the importance of the health care debate in the Nation, Chief Justice Roberts would not want the Court – if it could be avoided – to decide the mandate’s fate on a thin 5-4 vote. Thus, if Kennedy wound up casting a vote for the mandate, there is some speculation that Roberts might well join in.

In fact, in the second hour, Roberts was reciting – for lawyers Clement and Carvin – some of the government’s basic justifications for the requirement. Although he made clear that those were the government’s points, not his personally, he spelled them out in a way that did not sound as skeptical as he had seemed in the first hour.

The result, though, is not likely to be known until the Justices release their ruling on the mandate, and other issues surrounding the new Affordable Care Act, probably late in June.

Lyle Denniston is the National Constitution Center’s Adviser on Constitutional Literacy. He has reported on the Supreme Court for 54 years, currently covering it for SCOTUSblog, an online clearing house of information about the Supreme Court’s work.

Also Read

View the original article here

Saturday, February 4, 2012

Go Red To Support Women's Heart Health

40/29's Lauren Limerick has details on the day that are sure to touch your heart.

Sorry, I could not read the content fromt this page.

View the original article here

Thursday, January 12, 2012