Showing posts with label Market. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Market. Show all posts

Saturday, June 30, 2012

Health care, bank stocks lead stock market lower

NEW YORK (AP) — Health care stocks tumbled Thursday after the Supreme Court upheld most of President Barack Obama's health care overhaul, falling along with major banks as Wall Street worried about the European debt crisis and the sluggish U.S. economy.

It had already been a bad morning for the market, which was dragged down sharply by news about regulatory investigations at Barclays, JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup and others.

Then, the high court upheld a key provision of the health care law, and the losses accelerated.

Although health care and finance dominated the headlines, the market's concerns were more widespread, stretching to numerous types of companies and economic data.

The Commerce Department said the American economy expanded at a 1.9 percent annual rate in the first quarter, a weak pace that isn't expected to pick up. The government also reported that unemployment applications fell last week, but only slightly, and analysts worried that the claims are still too high to indicate a recovery.

News Corp, parent of the Wall Street Journal and the 20th Century Fox movie studio, fell after it said it planned to split into two companies. Family Dollar declined after reporting that it missed analysts' estimates for revenue and profits.

Major indexes in France, Britain, Germany and Greece were down as the European Union met in Brussels. Leaders are trying to hammer out how to deal with the weakest countries, like Greece and Spain, but many of the previous meetings have failed to produce concrete plans.

"The first one thousand summits, I was pretty excited," deadpanned Jeff Sica, president and chief investment officer of SICA Wealth Management in Morristown, N.J.

David Lefkowitz, senior equity strategist at UBS wealth management research in New York, was also watching Europe more than the health care ruling or the bank probes. Health insurance companies make up only about 1 percent of the Standard & Poor's 500, he said.

And even concerns about the indirect effects of the health care law — like whether it will cause small businesses to curb hiring — can get overblown, he said. The much bigger cost of hiring is still salaries.

In the U.S., the Dow Jones industrial average fell throughout the morning. It was already down about 100 points by 10 a.m., 30 minutes into trading and just before the Supreme Court released its decision. It fell as much as 165 points later in the morning, then recovered some of those losses.

By 1 p.m., it was down 128 points, or about 1 percent, to 12,499. Thursday could be the Dow's second triple-digit loss this week.

The S&P 500 fell 13 points to 1,318. The Nasdaq composite index fell 43 points to 2,833.

JPMorgan was down 4.5 percent, more than any other company in the Dow index of 30 stocks. The New York Times reported early Thursday that a trading loss there, previously estimated at about $2 billion, could top $9 billion. JPMorgan's stock has lost 14 percent since then, compared to 3 percent for the Dow.

The U.S.-listed shares of Barclays plunged 15 percent. Regulators in the U.S. and the U.K. on Wednesday announced that the British bank would settle accusations that it had manipulated international interest rates, which are important because they affect how much consumers pay on mortgages and other loans.

On Thursday, banking stocks got another dose of unwelcome news when British regulators announced that their investigation had expanded to Citigroup, Britain's HSBC, Switzerland's UBS and the Royal Bank of Scotland'.

Financial stocks fell more than any of the other nine industry groups on the S&P 500, losing 1.7 percent in the afternoon.

Health care stocks fell 1 percent, led by sharp declines in insurers like UnitedHealth Group, WellPoint and Aetna.

But hospitals had the opposite reaction, with stocks rising notably at Hospital Corp. of America and Community Health Systems.

The reasons for the disparity weren't clear cut.

The health care law will require all Americans to carry insurance. So for hospitals and related industries, like companies that make surgical instruments or lab equipment, that can mean more customers.

It also means more customers for insurance companies. But some of those customers won't be as profitable as the companies might like, such as those who are already sick.

Even with the ruling in hand, there's plenty of uncertainty overhanging the issue. Small businesses aren't sure how much money to set aside now that more of them will be required to insure their employees. The health care law also doesn't address the overhanging problem of looming deficits in Medicare.

"It's not like we're at the end of the road here," said Gerard Wedig, a health care economist at the University of Rochester, "where our health care problems are solved."


View the original article here

Monday, March 26, 2012

Health Care Market Analysis Finds Pittsburgh Uses Substantially More Services, Resulting in Higher Costs to Employers

PITTSBURGH, March 26, 2012  /PRNewswire/ -- To provide its members with a baseline understanding of health care delivery and costs in the Pittsburgh region, the non-profit Pittsburgh Business Group on Health (PBGH), an employer-led coalition, commissioned a health care market analysis that found the Pittsburgh region uses substantially more health care services, than comparative markets — Cleveland, St. Louis, and Cincinnati. As analyzed, the Pittsburgh region's annual burden for additional hospitalizations was $187 million.

The Health Care Incentives Improvement Institute (HCI3), a non-profit organization focused on improving health care quality and value through evidence-based incentive and provider payment solutions, worked with PBGH to analyze the market comparison to better understand the relationship between the supply of hospital beds and the frequency of hospitalizations in the four comparable U.S. metropolitan areas. The findings and recommendations were released today in an HCI3 Issue Brief. The initial research was conducted by FORTE Information Resources.

"Due to the uncertainty of the changing landscape of health care, nationally and in the Pittsburgh region, and the potential impact this may have on employers' benefits programs, it was critical to develop a baseline understanding of the delivery and cost of health care in our market," said M. Christine Whipple, PBGH executive director. "It was equally important to determine if the cost and use of health care services is different, and if so, examine how and why. We found that the higher use of services in the Pittsburgh region is producing higher costs for health care. However, without knowing the actual payments to providers for health care services (and the link to the information), it is unclear just how much more employers, and their employees, are paying for health care in our region."

Cheryl Melinchak, PBGH board president and director, Benefits, Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC, indicated, "These studies raise thought-provoking questions about health care in the Pittsburgh region. Based on this type of information, and the current climate, employers have the best opportunity in years to influence the payments and delivery of health care services in our region."

Results
Both Cleveland and Pittsburgh have a higher number of beds per 1,000 residents than are found in Cincinnati or St. Louis. Among these communities, Cincinnati has the fewest hospitals, yet its occupancy rate is among the lowest despite having one of the highest Medicare patient case mix severity adjustments. Adjusted length of stay is second only to that of Pittsburgh.

"Whether one compares U.S. regions or the care major academic medical centers provide — a large fraction of the nearly two-fold differences in per-patient costs that are observed, after accounting for patient case-mix, are due to differences in utilization rates of supply sensitive services," said Elliott S. Fisher, MD, MPH, professor of Medicine at the Dartmouth Medical School and director, Population Health and Policy at The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice. "Patients cared for in regions that have a greater relative supply of beds and physicians spend more time in the hospital, have more frequent physician visits (especially by specialists), and get more diagnostic tests and imaging services."

Francois de Brantes, HCI3 executive director noted, "By making data available on the costs and quality of care, we can better identify where employers, insurers and providers can collaborate to improve health care in Pittsburgh. Two such areas are payment reform and the use of value-based purchasing and benefit designs. Employers should demand from their health plans new payment models that impose financial risk on providers for excessive and unwarranted use of services. Additionally, Pittsburgh's employers would benefit by being more aggressive in incenting employees to use low cost, high-value providers. Benefit designs can provide the practical way to drive employees to use higher value hospitals that can result in providers moderating their price increases."

Study methodology
Two separate analyses were conducted to measure total hospital capacity in each community and the contribution of that capacity to health care costs. First, PBGH commissioned FORTE to develop the Pittsburgh Health Care Market Comparison, which provides a market assessment of demographic and general health care characteristics, hospital utilization and discharge analyses of specific diagnoses and procedures in each of the four regions. Secondly, HCI3 standardized the community-wide information and using its internal benchmark data of commercially insured health plan members estimated the average national cost of a bed day. This estimate was used to compare the potential added cost of hospital usage on total health care costs in Pittsburgh against that of the other markets.

About the Health Care Incentives Improvement Institute™, Inc.
The Health Care Incentives Improvement Institute, Inc. (HCI3) is a non-profit multi-stakeholder umbrella organization for Bridges to Excellence® and PROMETHEUS Payment®. The mission of the organization is to create significant improvements in the quality and affordability of health care by developing and implementing programs that recognize and reward physicians, hospitals and other health care providers that deliver safe, timely, effective, efficient, equitable and patient-centered care. HCI3 offers a comprehensive package of solutions to employers, health plans and coalitions to improve the flawed incentives that currently permeate the U.S. health care system. www.HCI3.org

About the Pittsburgh Business Group on Health
Founded in 1981, the Pittsburgh Business Group on Health (PBGH) is an employer-led coalition representing over 80 members regional and national members. The coalition, promoting education, collaboration, and innovation to manage costs and drive value in health care and benefits, raises awareness and highlights leading edge strategies through its community forums, members' only meetings, annual conferences and health care market analyses and benchmarking surveys. www.pbghpa.com.

NOTE TO EDITORS: The PBGH Pittsburgh Health Care Market Comparison available to accredited media upon request.


View the original article here

Wednesday, January 18, 2012